Introduction
If you have practiced real estate or property litigation for more than a few years, you have noticed a shift. Boundary disputes and easement conflicts that once moved automatically into state court are increasingly being resolved — or at least attempted — through arbitration. This trend has accelerated meaningfully since 2020, driven by pandemic-era court backlogs, rising litigation costs, and a growing recognition among practitioners that technical land disputes do not always benefit from a generalist judge and a jury unfamiliar with surveying principles.
For attorneys who handle boundary, easement, riparian, and title disputes, understanding the arbitration landscape — including how to prepare and present surveying evidence in that forum — is no longer optional. It is a core competency.
This article examines why arbitration is gaining ground in land disputes, what advantages it offers over traditional litigation, and what attorneys and arbitrators alike need to understand when technical surveying evidence is at the center of the case.
The Shift Toward Arbitration in Property Disputes
Court dockets for real property litigation have been strained for years. In many jurisdictions, a contested boundary or easement case may sit in the queue for 18 to 36 months before reaching trial. For clients with ongoing use conflicts — a blocked access easement, a disputed property line that affects construction, a riparian rights dispute affecting a working waterfront — that timeline is often untenable.
Arbitration offers a path to binding resolution in weeks or months rather than years. According to the American Arbitration Association (AAA), real estate arbitration cases are among the fastest-growing categories in their commercial docket, with an increasing number of residential and commercial property disputes being submitted voluntarily or pursuant to contractual arbitration clauses included in real estate purchase agreements, lease agreements, and easement instruments.
Why Attorneys Are Choosing Arbitration
- Speed: Arbitration typically resolves in a fraction of the time litigation requires, reducing carrying costs for clients.
- Confidentiality: Unlike court proceedings, arbitration is private. For high-net-worth clients and commercial property owners, this is a significant advantage.
- Arbitrator selection: Parties can select an arbitrator with genuine expertise in real estate law or property disputes — a significant advantage over a generalist judge assigned at random.
- Procedural flexibility: Rules on discovery and evidence are more adaptable, allowing technical evidence to be presented in formats that serve clarity rather than strict procedural compliance.
- Finality: In most cases, arbitration awards are binding and difficult to appeal, providing genuine resolution rather than a judgment that invites further litigation.
- Cost predictability: While arbitration is not always less expensive than litigation, costs are more controllable and timelines are more predictable.
Where Arbitration Has Particular Advantages in Land Disputes
Not every property dispute is equally well-suited to arbitration. The cases where arbitration tends to perform best share a common characteristic: they are technically complex but not legally novel. Boundary disputes, easement scope conflicts, riparian rights determinations, and surveyor standard of care claims all fall squarely in this category.
These cases turn on evidence — survey plats, deed calls, historical records, field observations, and expert interpretation of surveying standards. They do not typically involve unsettled questions of law. The outcome depends heavily on which party presents a more credible, better-supported technical narrative. That is exactly the kind of case where an arbitrator with real estate or surveying background adds genuine value over a generalist judge.
Practical Considerations for Counsel
- Arbitration clause review: When drafting or reviewing easement agreements, deed restrictions, or property development contracts, consider including arbitration clauses that specify ADR for boundary and easement disputes.
- Arbitrator selection: Advocate for an arbitrator or arbitration panel with demonstrated real estate or property law experience. A retired judge with a general civil background is not the same as one who has handled property line disputes.
- Expert witness preparation: Surveying expert testimony is as critical in arbitration as in trial. The format differs — there is no jury — but the need for clear, objective, credentialed analysis is exactly the same.
- Discovery strategy: Arbitration discovery is typically more limited than in litigation. Plan your expert’s work product to be comprehensive enough that it speaks for itself without extensive deposition preparation.
The Role of Expert Witnesses in Arbitrated Land Disputes
In any forum — trial, arbitration, or mediation — boundary and easement disputes live or die on the quality of the expert evidence. An arbitrator, even one with strong real estate law experience, is not a land surveyor. The technical interpretation of deeds, monuments, historical plats, and survey evidence requires a qualified surveying expert who can translate that evidence into plain language without losing precision.
Dr. Tony Nettleman has served as an expert witness in boundary, easement, title, and riparian disputes in both litigation and arbitration forums across the United States. His preparation process is identical regardless of the forum: thorough document and records review, field survey where appropriate, and an objective expert report that presents findings clearly enough that the decision-maker — judge, jury, or arbitrator — can follow the analysis without a technical background in surveying.
What changes in arbitration is the delivery. Arbitrators tend to be more experienced readers of technical material, which allows experts to present more nuanced analysis without excessive simplification. The back-and-forth of direct and cross-examination is often more focused, and the expert who has done thorough work has room to demonstrate depth.
What to Look for in a Surveying Expert for Arbitration
Selecting the right expert for an arbitrated land dispute is as important as selecting the right arbitrator. Key qualifications to look for:
- Multi-state licensure: If the arbitration involves a dispute that crosses state lines or involves federal land, national licensure coverage matters.
- Law degree or legal training: An expert who understands not just the technical surveying standards but how they interact with property law is significantly more effective in any forum.
- Daubert-proof credentials: Even in arbitration, where Daubert does not formally apply, an expert whose credentials and methods would survive Daubert scrutiny brings more credibility to the table.
- Publication record: Experts who have published textbooks, academic articles, or trade journal contributions carry demonstrable authority that an arbitrator will recognize.
- Objectivity: The most dangerous expert in any forum is one who is perceived as a hired gun. The most valuable expert is one whose analysis follows the evidence regardless of which side retained them.
Conclusion
Arbitration is not a replacement for litigation in every land dispute. But for boundary, easement, and title cases where the outcome turns on technical surveying evidence, it is increasingly the smarter forum — faster, more private, more controllable, and better suited to the kind of technical analysis these cases require.
Attorneys who understand how to leverage arbitration effectively in land disputes — including how to select the right arbitrator and present the right expert evidence — are better positioned to serve their clients and achieve faster, more durable resolutions.
If you are an attorney handling a boundary, easement, riparian, or title dispute and would like to discuss the role a surveying expert witness can play in your matter — whether in arbitration or litigation — contact Dr. Nettleman’s office for a confidential case review.
Need a Court-Ready Boundary Survey Process?
If you are already involved in a property dispute or litigation is likely, starting with a structured, expert-led process matters.
NLC Expert Services begins with a free consultation to determine fit and recommend the correct next step.
✅ Take the Quiz to see if you need an Expert Surveyor